Comparison tool
TB-500 vs BPC-157 side-by-side
Stack up to four peptides by evidence status, mechanisms, study dosing, side effects, and references.
Comparison tool
Stack up to four peptides by evidence status, mechanisms, study dosing, side effects, and references.
Selected (2/4)
Share this peptide comparison
| Property | TB-500 | BPC-157 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Healing | Healing |
| Also known as | Thymosin Beta-4 fragment (LKKTETQ), Thymosin Beta-4, Fragment | Body Protection Compound-157, Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 |
| FDA approved | No | No |
| Clinical status | Preclinical - No human clinical trials. FDA Category 2 (pending reclassification to Category 1 per April 15, 2026 HHS announcement; remains Category 2 under current law until formal FDA rule; PCAC review July 23-24, 2026)
| Phase 2 recruiting (NCT07437547); investigational.
|
| What to expect | Muscle recovery, wound healing, injury rehabilitation | Injury recovery, gut healing, joint and tendon repair |
| How it works | TB-500 is presented as a synthetic peptide based on the thymosin beta-4 active region. The supplied source identifies LKKTETQ, residues 17 to 23, as the short sequence commonly reproduced in TB-500 products and ties that region to G-actin binding. Through this actin-related pathway, thymosin beta-4 research connects cytoskeletal remodeling with cell migration into wound areas. The source also reports anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic activity in lab models. The main uncertainty is translational: evidence from full-length thymosin beta-4 does not prove that a 7-amino-acid fragment will reproduce the parent molecule's full biological profile. | The supplied source describes several proposed pathways: VEGFR2-linked angiogenesis, nitric-oxide signaling involving Akt-eNOS, anti-inflammatory effects, and growth-factor signaling. It frames these as predominantly rodent findings and reports that the precise molecular target remains unresolved. These mechanistic claims require corroboration. |
| Typical dosing | 2-2.5 mg twice weekly (loading), then 2.5 mg once weekly (maintenance) · 2x weekly for 4-6 weeks, then 1x weekly | 250-500 mcg twice daily · 1-2x daily |
| Research dosing | 2-2.5 mg twice weekly · 4-6 weeks loading, then maintenance · Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection | 250-500 mcg twice daily · 4-12 weeks in most research protocols · Subcutaneous injection near injury site, or systemic |
| Typical duration | 4-6 weeks loading, then maintenance | 4-12 weeks in most research protocols |
| Administration | Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection | Subcutaneous injection near injury site, or systemic |
| Timing | Morning or evening With or without food | Morning and evening (or near injury site timing) With or without food |
| Evidence level | Preclinical | Clinical Trials |
| Possible side effects |
+7 more
|
+6 more
|
| Research summary | The supplied research summary places TB-500 mainly in a preclinical evidence category and says most of the stronger evidence concerns full-length thymosin beta-4 rather than the TB-500 fragment. It reports animal findings in wound, scar, tendon, skin, and cardiac injury models. For human data, the source discusses RegeneRx programs using thymosin beta-4 forms: RGN-259 eye drops in a placebo-controlled Phase 3 neurotrophic keratopathy study, where corneal healing was reported in 6 of 10 treated patients versus 1 of 8 on placebo, and RGN-352 injection, which reached Phase 2 in a cardiac program before a manufacturing hold. These programs are not presented as human efficacy trials of the 7-amino-acid TB-500 fragment. For TB-500 as a fragment, the source states there are no completed, published human efficacy trials for muscle or tendon repair and mentions a recently listed cardiovascular biomarker study as early-stage. | According to the supplied account of a 2025 Biomedicines narrative review, the record includes hundreds of animal studies across tendon, muscle, bone, gastrointestinal, liver, and nervous-system models, but only three human pilot reports: knee-pain injection, bladder injection for interstitial cystitis, and intravenous safety. The same account reports no completed randomized controlled human trials and no regulatory approval. It further describes rapid breakdown into amino-acid fragments and a sub-30 minute elimination half-life after injection in rats and dogs, leaving oral delivery uncertain. These claims require independent corroboration. |
| References | ||
| Full profile | View Details | View Details |
Save this comparison
Keep this research set handy with a free PeptiGuide account.
Save this comparison - free accountTrack your peptide journey
Turn research into a private protocol log when you are ready.
Track your peptide journeyEducational use only. This information is aggregated from public research and community reports. It is not medical advice, and dosing details are descriptive, not recommendations. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.